INTRODUCTION
THERE has never been a more colossal and successful deception, nor one which has been so enormously profitable in every way for its perpetrators, than the Myth that Hitler and his Nazis killed six million Jews.
But, you might ask, why should one concern himself with merely one more lie - and an old one, at that - when we are lied to so many times each day by armies of advertisers, preachers, salesmen and politicians?
And the answer is that the direct effects of this Myth go far beyond the fact that since the end of World War 11 the people of Western Germany have been forced to pay more than ten billion dollars to Israel and to individual Jews elsewhere as "restitution." The answer is that the effects of this Myth have a direct and an ever-increasing impact on each of us, every day.
For the truly critical effect of the Myth is that it has made impossible rational and public discussion of the most vital matters, the understanding of which are central to our well-being.
Take recent history, for example. There is an immutable and rigidly-fixed dogma, taught to all of the people through movies, television programs and in all of the universities of the land, that the Germans were uniquely and solely responsible for starting World War 11. Thus, the unspeakably disastrous political results of that war - the rise of Communism and the destruction of Europe as a world force, as well as the nearly infinite human suffering both during and after the war: 50 million lives lost, an ultimate financial cost of 25 trillion dollars or more - can be comfortably blamed on the Nazi devils without the pain of having to examine the possibility that Britain, America and our "noble ally," the Soviet Union, were not entirely blameless.
Another subject which has been completely removed from the realm of rational, open discussion by the repressive effects of the Myth is that mysterious international force known as Zionism. just what is the true extent of the power that this shadowy force exerts over all of the governments of the West? Do Zionism and Communism spring from the same origins, and are they still interconnected today? Were the only two victors of the war Zionism and Communism? If so, what part did they play in its incitement? What is the connection of Zionism with the news media and with those very practical and profit-minded men who control our money system? What are the real aims of Zionism? Does Zionism, like Communism, profit from the steady decline of the West and the spoilation of its peoples? The shocking fact is that none of these questions may be discussed today in any public forum; all discussion of them must be confined to very private groups lest one is suspected of harboring thoughts unfriendly to Jews. For is not all discussion of Jews and Jewry, ipso facto, anti-Semitism? And is it not but a step from anti-Semitism to genocide?
The perpetration of the Myth of the Six Million has also made it impossible to come to grips with our overwhelming race problem - a fact which is made evident by smoking ruins in our cities, savage jungles in our schools and a steady and accelerating drift downward toward not mere anarchy but the irrevocable loss of our European culture and our racial heritage. n, e problems which grow from Negro-White contact in the same society* must always be referred to as legal, Constitutional, moral, psychological or sociological problems, never can the race problem be referred to in its real terms - a biological and a political problem - for this, it is uniformly argued by all of the "experts" and advisors, is racism-the very hallmark of the Nazi!
* * *
One of America's greatest historians was Harry Elmer Barnes, who spent the last years of his courageous and productive life investigating and commenting on the foibles of the "court historians," as he called them. Writing in the Rampart Journal (Summer, 1967), Dr. Barnes said:
What is deemed important today is not whether Hitler started war in 1939, or whether Roosevelt was responsible for Pearl Harbor, but the number of prisoners who were allegedly done to death in the concentration camps operated by Germany during the war. These camps were first presented as those in Germany, such as Dachau, Belsen, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen, and Dora, but it was demonstrated that there had been no systematic extermination in those camps. Attention was then moved on to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Chelmno, Jonowska, Tarnow, Ravensbruck, Mauthausen, Brezeznia, and Birkenau, which does not exhaust the list that appears to have been extended as needed.
An attempt to make a competent, objective, and truthful investigation of the extermination question is now regarded as far more objectionable and deplorable than Professor Bemis viewed charging Roosevelt with war responsibility. It is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today; indeed, so "hoV' and dangerous that only a lone French scholar, Paul Rassinier, has made any serious systematic effort to enter the field, although Taylor obviously recognizes the need for such work and hints as to where it would lead. But this vital matter would have to be handled resolutely and thoroughly in any future World War II revisionist book that could hope to refute the new approach and strategy of the blackout and smotherout contingents.
The importance of this book, as Dr. Barnes suggests, is that it represents precisely "the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today."
* * *
The need for anonymity on the part of the author of this little volume is obvious. He is a college professor and. intends to remain the same and to retain his standing and income, and one day to retire on a well-earned pension - none of which would be remotely possible if his identity should be discovered by the propagators of "brotherhood," "freedom of the press" and "academic freedom."
The manuscript itself was completed eight years ago and has not been presented to the public before this because no publisher until now could be found willing to dare the risks involved.
* * *
In order to prepare the reader for his imminent excursion into the anatomy of the biggest lie of all time, what could be more appropriate than to reprint the words of the man who, we are authoritatively told by all of our history books and journalists, invented the very concept of the Big Lie, the monster himself, Adolf Hitler? Describing his historic achievement, in Volume I, Chapter 10 of Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote this passage, often referred to but seldom quoted:
[The Jews] proceeded on the sound principle that the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of people in the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than be consciously and purposely evil; therefore, because of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they, themselves lie in little things but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads, and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick--a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of.
The foremost connoisseurs of this truth regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews; for after all, their whole existence is based on one single great lie: to wit, that they are a religious community ...
- E. L. ANDERSON
Sausalito, California
September 25, 1968
* "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these [Negro] people are to be free; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion have drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation, peaceably, and in such slow degree, as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be, pari passu, filled up by free white laborers. If, in the contrary, it is left to force itself on, -human nature must shudder at the prospect held up."
- THOMAS JEFFERSON
[Note: The above quotation, the first eighteen words of which are quoted on the Jefferson Memorial, in order to give a false impression of Jefferson's beliefs, is to be found on page 164 of Life Writing's and Opinions of Thomas Jefferson, by B. L. Rafner, N.Y. 1832.]
To the first chapter
Back to table of contents