From: "Adelaide Institute" <info@adelaideinstitute.org>
To: "'Walter Mueller'" <thetruthisback@yahoo.com>
Cc: "CHP" <chp@vho.org>
Subject: Using people
Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:25 PM

Walter, 

Thanks for your response.

We all use people - mutual benefit of association - that then needs to be
augmented with empathetic understanding, natural justice, a general moral
framework, etc. I try to do it that way - and many a times it has helped
retain workable relationships if not outright love, i.e. if one bothers and
cares in retaining certain relationships.

Thanks

Fredrick

PS: Without asking for your permission, I am sending a copy of this email to
Germar - as your Right-of-Reply to my letter.


====================================== 

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Mueller [mailto:thetruthisback@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2005 11:09 AM
To: info@adelaideinstitute.org
Subject: Re: A partial view inside Revisionism's politics...

Dear Fredrick,

I was not surprised to receive your letter in defense
of Germar Rudolf. I have known for a long time that
you are good friends. 

Let me first get something out of the way. If you
think I apologize, you have another thing coming. If
any apology is to make, then it is Germar Rudolf and
his associates. 

You know that I was right about my assessment of him
being a narcissist. For the last year, I have tried so
hard to get along with him, however, that arrogant
bastard wouldn't even say thank you for ANYTHING we
did for him. He didn't even acknowledge it. 

His defense of Jamie Kelso prooved to me that the
Kelso letter is not fake. But here is one thing we can
do. He leaves me alone and I leave him alone. 

Should he continue to bash me, I will publish several
letters from him that Harvey Taylor gave to me. In
these letters he did more than just assassinate my
character. So, it's that easy. All I ask from Germar
Rudolf is to be left alone. He is a user and I had to
find it out the hard way!

Walter





--- Adelaide Institute <info@adelaideinstitute.org>
wrote:

> Walter - 'emotionale Selbstzerfleischung' - the
> Germans are good at that!
> 
> 1. Full-blown politics has, again, hit Revisionism -
> that's life. Our
> Australian Prime Minister has just begun his new
> term with a majority of one
> in the Senate, and just now he has pleaded and
> advised with his crew that
> party unity must be maintained. The opposition labor
> Party has become
> irrelevant and can't even get sound-bites on account
> of the focus on the
> seat of power...while the Coalition Nationals'
> Barnaby Jones, the one who
> has given the government control of the Senate,
> refuses to yield to Howard,
> and up to now he claims he will be representing his
> constituents in the
> state of Queensland.
> 
> 2. The stakes are high in politics. In Australia it
> is still about the
> privatisation of the national telephone carrier -
> Telstra. Revisionists
> don't know too much about such battle of the wills
> because we are not into
> the millions of dollars - and when this occurred
> during the early 1990s, we
> saw how Carto was challenged and had his IHR taken
> away from him.
> 
> 3. Generally, though, Revisionists are not really in
> a power-surge, except
> in a personal way when the inevitable legal pincer
> movement begins its work
> on us as we are locked up.
> 
> 4. Generally then, Revisionists are lucky in that we
> have a small
> power-supporter base - and when that disappears,
> then we call it a day and
> daydream in our splendid isolation.
> 
> 5. Having said this, Walter, I do not understand why
> you had to lash out at
> Germar Rudolf who is so vulnerable, legally and
> financially - and to whom
> you show little empathy. I have read Germar's as yet
> unpublished reply to
> your email of yesterday, and although in the past I
> have been naughty in not
> eliciting from another person a right of reply
> before publishing an item -
> the last one concerning Mel Fowler on Kevin Strom -
> I would have expected
> you to clarify things with Germar before lashing
> out.
> 
> 6. We do have a gentleman, Stahl, who in his
> splendid isolation is fighting
> with David Irving - who isn't?, and also with Germar
> Rudolf - and such
> activity even involves forged documents to prove a
> case.
> 
> 7. The question I would now ask is, in whose
> interest is this latest
> squabble?  Just as with the 2004 Sacramento
> Conference planning, the initial
> impetus for sabotage came from Ingrid Rimland who
> wished to discredit me
> with that tag, which I consider rather funny: "he
> screws women from eight to
> 80", rather a compliment and a certain gentleman
> asked me to help him out
> with one of mine! Was this comment designed to get
> you horny or what? Now
> you let fly on account of what you thought Germar
> Rudolf had said/written
> about you. Is this a matter where our so-called
> enemy just sits back and
> sows discord by proxy!
> 
> 8. Email traffic is tremendous if the sources are
> checked where and if they
> matter, as it mattered in that Kelso-Rudolf-Mueller
> item. 
> 
> 9. Without slipping into the conspiracy mode -
> something that is always an
> actuality, and is all too often a physical fact as
> soon as more than one
> individual starts to think and act - you now have to
> observe who rubs their
> hands in glee at the Mueller-Rudolf flare-up, then
> sends consoling notes to
> you, that you did the right thing. I do hope you
> have not adopted the
> typical German attitude of Rechthaberei - I am
> right, I am right! The
> right-wrong thinking does not help clarify issues
> ...
> 
> 10. Here's my position: I know both of you and I
> value both your different
> kinds of Revisionist work - both of you have the
> typical German dynamic for
> hard work; presenting a daily email service is no
> mean feat, and being a
> one-man publishing powerhouse - and a political
> refugee at that - is also no
> mean feat. In this way the whole spectrum of
> humanity is offered a
> Revisionist viewpoint - on a daily basis and at more
> depth. 
> Just compare Prof Butz's website to other
> Revisionist websites - his is lean
> and mean but fundamental because he assumes that he
> does not have to
> regurgitate the basic known facts of an issue again
> and again. 
> What about Prof Faurisson? He does not wish to be
> bombarded by daily emails
> from just anybody - and as happened recently, he
> shies away from starting
> anew in presenting his basic thesis that he nutted
> out over 30 years ago to
> someone who just happened to stumble on Faurisson's
> challenge. I imply here
> that Germar Rudolf simply does not have he time to
> read your daily email -
> and he relies on others to sift through it for any
> goodies that may be found
> therein. 
> Jürgen Graf battles uncertainty in Russia and
> continues to explore and
> translate for the Revisionist cause. He does not
> have the time to read a
> daily email. 
> Even Irving called my emails 'spam mail', something
> I disagreed with because
> he could have asked to be taken off the list - in a
> polite way. And so it
> goes on.
> There is in Revisionism, as in any human enterprise,
> a definite seniority
> ladder, a pecking-order, if you wish. And it is
> humbling, for example, for
> me to meet a man who in five years has produced so
> much material that I can
> see my 12 years' work fading into insignificance.
> More on this man's work in
> our September newsletter.
> There are others still who hold on to their claim
> for any importance among
> Revisionists by stating - and counting - to have
> 'deflowered' the ignorant
> of their false beliefs, and now bathe in the glory
> of the hard workers,
> while themselves sitting back doing no more work
> expect trying to find
> converts, much as any religious enterprising person,
> and of course
> supporting the cause financially. 
> I sense that anyone who wishes to contribute to
> Revisionism, particularly
> 'Holocaust' Revisionism, can still find a niche and
> be productive and
> support the powerhouse that is Germar Rudolf - among
> others, I hasten to add
> - so as not to offend the delicate and fragile
> individuals who need
> buttering up - as we all do at one time or another
> in varying degrees when
> we are hit with exhaustion that comes from
> contemplating the odds against
> which we fight - a multi-billion dollar 'Holocaust'
> industry.
> 
> 11. Walter, in this sense, I do hope that you review
> and reflect on matters
> in the hope of staying focused so as not to slip
> into non-productivity that
> befell the IHR as the productive energy was sapped
> in fighting the
> Revisionist and not the Revisionism ball. The
> comment you made about Germar
> and his wife - and I say this as someone who knows
> both, and as a somewhat
> mature 61-year-old male whose judgment is tempered
> by personal disasters -
> is that it is below the line and way out of line.
> Sexually Germar is
> continent, and beyond reproach a heterosexual family
> man who, after all he
> has been through, still maintains his ideals of what
> life is all about. I
> have seen lesser individuals break down and hit the
> bottle and drugs and
> embrace hell where anything goes! Your comments on
> this particular aspect is
> pure gossip - and it does deserve a retraction, if
> not an apology, something
> I personally shy away from because it is given so
> easily. I once had this
> apology business with Mel Fowler, among others, but
> then it was over a
> view-point, I think, if my memory serves me
> correctly. Germar is mature
> enough to cope with such defamatory statements - but
> he does not need to be
> shot at from within Revisionism - again, in whose
> interest is all this, and
> is it a proxy attack of which you are not aware who
> is doing it?
> 
> 12. One comforting thought - all this in-fighting is
> a human condition and
> rather normal, and those that are now rubbing their
> hands in glee merely
> indicates their immaturity about human nature. To
> varying degrees it happens
> in families and companies and bureaucracies. Imagine
> the in-fighting that is
> going on between personnel from the White House,
> Pentagon, CIA, etc. For
> example, I personally liked Colin Powell, but he
> gave the game away when he
> lied about the war on 5 February 2003 before the UN.
> This moral imperative
> also operates within Revisionism, within any human
> enterprise. We should
> take to heart what the Arabic-speaking world stated
> about the Iraq war: With
> my brother I'll fight my cousin; with my brother and
> cousin I'll fight the
> enemy outside. Revisionists know who the enemy is,
> and that we have all the
> makings of power politics, i.e. 911 as an insider
> job, is to be expected
> wherever independent thinkers work on an enterprise 
> 
> Submitted for your consideration.
> 
> Fredrick Töben
> 
> ===============================
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walter Mueller
> [mailto:thetruthisback@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2005 11:57 AM
> To: Walter F. Mueller
> Subject: PATRIOT LETTER: GERMAR RUDOLF FOLLOW UP --
> MARTIN WEBSTER --
> ADELAIDE INSTITUTE -- MONIKA -- AND MORE
> 
> Dear Fellow Patriot!
> 
> 
>
######################################################
> 
> Zundel In Germany: 
> 
> http://www.adelaideinstitute.org
> 
> For Zundel updates please visit the above website!
> 
> To submit news, information, etc. about Ernst
> Zundel, please e-mail
> 
> info@adelaideinstitute.org
> 
>
######################################################
> 
> 
> Yesterday's Patriot Letter surprisingly generated
> very little response. Here
> are two I've chosen to print:
> 
> The Hun:
> 
> [START]
> 
> Re: PATRIOT LETTER: GERMAR RUDOLF... 
> To: "Walter Mueller" <thetruthisback@yahoo.com> 
>     
> Walter,
> 
> You really let Germar have it!  Didn’t you?  Your
> write-up reminded me of a
> passage in Francis Parker Yockey’s IMPERIUM, which I
> red the first time in
> hard cover about 40 years ago.  Yockey addressed the
> difference between an
> ‘antagonist’ and  an ‘enemy’ on pages 129-131.  I’ll
> quote:
> 
> “Enemy, then, does not mean competitor. Nor does it
> mean opponent in
> general. Least of all does it describe a person whom
> one hates from feelings
> of personal antipathy. Latin possessed two words:
> hostis for the public
> enemy, inimicus for a private enemy.
> Our Western languages unfortunately do not make this
> important distinction.
> Greek however did possess it, and had further a deep
> distinction between two
> types of wars: those against other Greeks, and those
> against outsiders of
> the Culture, barbarians. The former were "agons" and
> only the latter were
> true wars. An agon was originally a contest for a
> prize at the public games,
> and the opponent was the "antagonist." This
> distinction has value for us
> because in comparison with wars in this age,
> intra-European wars of the
> preceding 800 years were agonal. As nationalistic
> politics assumed the
> ascendancy within the Classical Culture, with the
> Peloponnesian Wars, the
> distinction passed out of Greek usage. 17th and 18th
> century wars in
> West-Europe were in the nature of contests for a
> prize — the prize being a
> strip of territory, a throne, a title. The
> participants were dynasties, not
> peoples. The idea of destroying the opposing dynasty
> was not present, and
> only in the exceptional case was there even the
> possibility of such a thing
> happening.
> Enemy, in the political sense, thus means public
> enemy. It is unlimited, and
> it is thus distinguished from private enmity. The
> distinction public-private
> can only arise when there is a super-personal unit
> present. When there is,
> it determines who is friend and enemy, and thus no
> private person can make
> such a determination. He may hate those who oppose
> him or who are
> distasteful to him, or who compete with him, but he
> may not treat them as
> enemies in the unlimited sense.
> The lack of two words to distinguish public and
> private enemy also has
> contributed to confusion in the interpretation of
> the well-known Biblical
> passage (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27) "Love your
> enemies." The Greek and Latin
> versions use the words referring to a private enemy.
> And this is indeed to
> what the passage refers. It is obviously an
> adjuration to put aside hatred
> and malice, but there is no necessity whatever that
> one hate the public
> enemy. Hatred is not contained in political
> thinking. Any hatred worked up
> against the public enemy is non-political, and
> always shows some weakness in
> the internal political situation. This Biblical
> passage does not adjure one
> to love the public enemy, and during the wars
> against Saracen and Turk no
> Pope, saint, or philosopher so construed it. It
> certainly does not counsel
> treason out of love for the public enemy.” (End)
> 
> It is clear how the enmity during World War One and
> Two evolved.  In 1916,
> Germany was still able to view the fight as a local
> problem between equals,
> leading it to making a peace offer with the desire
> to stop the carnage.  But
> then, after 1916, extra-European powers, the
> Zionists and their patsy Wilson
> took center stage, and that ‘private enmity’ turned
> into all out total war
> and destruction.
>   
> The same happened again during World War Two. 
> Hitler’s war was short and to the point.  For
> example, the French were able
> to form a new government with one of their old war
> heroes in charge.  French
> officers on word of honor to keep out of any further
> fighting, were free to
> go home to their families! (From Ambassador Robert
> Murphy’s autobiography.)
> And as we all know, the Limeys were free to go home
> from Dunkirk.
> 
> But to get back to you and Germar.  Which is it now,
> are you only
> antagonists or are you going to be bitter enemies? 
>  
> “The Hun”
> 
> [END]
> 
> Michael:
> 
> [START]
> 
> NPD
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:34:13 -0600 
> 
> Good morning Walter:
> 
> I found your NPD atricle most interesting and
> enlightening. I had a very
> bitter and costly experience with an NPD personality
> only I never knew what
> it was but you have hit the nail on the head!
> Thanks it all makes sense now.
> 
> Michael
> 
> [END]
> 
> Of course, there were a couple of the usual "can't
> we all get along." I have
> said it so many times, and I say it again: No, we
> can't. Because I am an
> adult and I choose who I want to get along with. 
> 
> But, let's get a little further into this issue of
> getting along. I hope all
> of those people who write such liberal sayings have
> forwarded that to all
> revisionists. Specifically to Germar Rudolf, who
> attacked me. As for the
> question of The Hun, I don't care about Rudolf, I
> have never met him and he
> is not part of my family or friends. It would be too
> much effort to consider
> him an enemy. I was just pointing out to be careful
> when dealing with him. 
> 
> Interestingly, I wonder where all these people were
> when the 2004 Conference
> was cancelled? The incredible attacks on me, my
> character, and my life by
> the U.S.
> revisionists and the white nationalist movement pale
> in comparison to what I
> wrote about Germar Rudolf yesterday. But there is
> also a big difference - I
> told the truth. 
> 
> Not even the traditional enemy has ever attacked me
> like this. Today,
> several revisionist sites still feature false
> Patriot Letters, where I
> "declare my gay-ness and a wedding reception at the
> conference."
> Violent threats by the National Alliance, Stormfront
> and other white
> supremacists flooded my answering machine. And I
> don't even want to talk
> about my e-mail. 
> 
> The most vicious, vile lies were distributed and
> posted on the Internet.
> Only my perseverance and dedication got me through
> this. Mark Weber, Germar
> Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Paul Fromm and his mistress
> Diane King, used the
> opportunity to make me the sacrificial lamb to even
> extort more money from
> their supporters. 
> 
> "Fudge Packer, Shit Eater, Butt Dart, Nazi, Hitler's
> Pastry Chef," are just
> a few of the more human names I was called. 
> 
> We worked our asses off for six months and worse,
> ambulance chaser Edgar
> Steele encouraged everyone to contact him if we
> wouldn't pay back the ticket
> money.
> Stormfront, EURO, and the National Alliance even
> accused us of cancelling
> the conference deliberately to make a buck. Others
> located us in Hawaii,
> spending the money. 
> 
> Not one of the U.S. revisionists came to defend us.
> In the contrary, they
> lamented their losses. Even though we went out of
> our way to minimize the
> damage - partially out of our own pocket. And you
> know what - we weren't
> obligated to do this, because we made it clear that
> there were no refunds.
> From $100 to $300 we gave each of our speakers to
> make up for their losses,
> as well as two of the speakers from the Adelaide
> Institute. 
> 
> We dined them and wined them and we made sure they
> had a safe way home. For
> Germar Rudolf, we actually made the mailing list
> available, after getting
> permission from the people on the list. We shipped
> HIS books at OUR EXPENSE
> to England. 
> 
> Bradley R. Smith pocketed the money without even a
> word of thank you.
> Stormfront troopers threatened us to beat the crap
> out of us if we don't
> comply with their demands, meaning to hand over our
> reservation list. 
> 
> National Alliance's April Gaede alleged that I was
> fucking my own brother,
> and that Dr. Tom Sunic was part of the "homosexual
> club" of the 2004
> Conference.
> 
> Aryan Nation alleged that Dr. Toben and I were a
> pair.
> 
> 
> The truth was that the JDL had shut us down and we
> weren't willing to start
> over again, two days before the conference. We lost
> more than $6,000. And
> when we received the refund for the deposit from the
> Turnverein, we ignored
> the demands from the IHR to give the money back and
> equally divided it as a
> partial refund to the ticket buyers. Not ever in the
> history of revisionist
> conferences has this happened.
> No refunds are given anywhere. I am pretty sure
> David Duke never refunded
> the money he stole. Check out Germar Rudolf, who
> keeps his surplus for yet
> another lawsuit. 
> 
> Today, the American Free Press still posts the false
> Patriot Letter with
> vicious lies. Now imagine, all this from people that
> call themselves
> revisionists. 
> 
> So, I do not care whether one likes that I dish out
> a little bit of their
> own medicine. Only the true revisionists with class
> supported us: Lady
> Michele Renouf, Hans Schmidt, Frank Schmidt, Richard
> Odorfer, Prof.
> Faurisson and his sister, Horst Mahler, Guenther
> Deckert, Dr. Claus
> Nordbruch and late Dr. Bob Countess, just to name a
> few. 
> 
> Remember that my Patriot Letter about Germar Rudolf
> yesterday was the truth.
> The 2004 Conference was well organized, publicized
> and excluded the extreme
> behavior of the white supremacists. Then I realized
> that money is the
> driving factor for the U.S.
> Revisionist movement. Who has the most subscribers,
> supporters, who is first
> and who makes the most. No integrity and honor. The
> U.S. revisionist
> community is as corrupt as the government. The U.S.
> white nationalist
> movement is nothing but a bunch of losers who cannot
> make it in the real
> world. 
> 
> I am proud to say again that despite the ordeal we
> were put through, we
> survived and became even stronger. So, don't tell me
> about attacks when you
> sat by and let this happen. 
> 
> Not a dime from this conference went into our own
> pockets. Holocaust
> revisionism for me is all about clearing the German
> people. Because we are
> proud and honorable people. Most German people
> reject the hateful behavior
> of white supremacists. The most important fact to
> remember about the
> conference is that most of the attacks came from
> people who claim to be
> better than those they fight. But they aren't. 
> 
> I won't ever associate myself with these people.
> They give us a bad name,
> and they are mostly racists, bigots and criminals.
> Holocaust revisionism
> involves all people. Besides, it makes no sense to
> continue to preach to the
> choir. If you have a problem with this, unsubscribe.
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Martin Webster:
> 
> [START]
> 
> www.haaretz.com - 6th August 2004 - 15:16
> 
> U.S. Presbyterian Church targets five companies with
> Israel links By Haaretz
> Service and News Agencies
> 
> A  Presbyterian committee accused five companies of
> contributing to "ongoing
> violence that plagues Israel and Palestine" and
> pledged to use the  church's
> multimillion-dollar stock holdings in the businesses
> to pressure  them to
> stop.
> 
> The move Friday follows a vote last year by leaders
> of the Presbyterian
> Church (U.S.A.) to put economic pressure on
> companies  that profit from
> Israeli policy in the West Bank and Gaza.
> 
> The  Church said the companies were selected based
> on its own developed
> criteria, namely companies which "support and
> maintain the occupation;
> establish, expand, or maintain Israeli settlements;
> support or facilitate
> violent acts by Israelis or Palestinians against
> innocent civilians; and
> support or facilitate the construction of the
> Separation Barrier."  
> 
> The group named heavy equipment manufacturer
> Caterpillar,  communications
> giant Motorola, military contractor United
> Technologies,  and electronics
> manufacturer ITT Industries - all of which are firms
> who  have been
> contracted to supply the Israel Defense Forces.
> 
> The  Church also listed international banking
> conglomerate Citigroup, which
> was  cited in April by The Wall Street Journal for
> "having moved substantial
> funds from charities later seen to be fronts
> funneling money to terrorist
> organizations," including "funds [which] ended up as
> payments to the
> families of Palestinian suicide bombers."
> 
> "We have chosen these  companies because we believe
> that they can make
> changes that will increase  the possibilities for a
> just peace in the
> region," said Carol Hylkema, who  heads a Church
> subcommittee spearheading
> divestiture from companies with  links to Israel. 
> 
> "As shareholders of these companies, the 
> Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) calls
> on them to act responsibly," she  said.
> 
> In a press release, the USPC said it hopes to engage
> in  dialogue and forms
> of public pressure on shareholders "so that these 
> corporations might change
> their business practices which inflict harm on  the
> innocent, and delay
> movement toward a just peace." 
> 
> "If these  dialogues fail, we may conclude that our
> investments are not
> being used  for activities that support the broad
> mission of the Church,"
> said church official Bill Somplatsky-Jarman. "At
> that point, divestment is
> an option  that the General Assembly may consider."
> 
> The moves comes months  after the World Council of
> Churches, the main global
> body uniting  non-Catholic Christians, encouraged
> members to sell off
> investments in  companies profiting from Israeli
> control of the West Bank
> and Gaza  Strip.
> 
> The Council's Central Committee, meeting in Geneva
> in February, praised the
> U.S. Presbyterian Church for examining the 
> possibility of divestment in
> Israel similar to the financial boycott it  used
> against the apartheid
> regime in South Africa two decades  ago.
> 
> The Presbyterian threat, which echoes divestment
> debates at  some U.S.
> universities, has set off a wave of dissent in the
> church and  angered
> American Jewish leaders.
> 
> But the Central Committee  highlighted the
> divestment push and encouraged
> other member churches to  consider doing the same.
> The New York Times
> reported Friday that the  Episcopal Church U.S.A.
> and the United Church of
> Christ, among others,  have praised the move and are
> also considering
> divestment as a means of swaying Israeli policy.
> 
> "This action is commendable in both method  and
> manner, uses criteria rooted
> in faith, and calls on members to do the  `things
> that make for peace'," the
> Central Committee said of the  Presbyterian Church's
> move, quoting St.
> Luke's Gospel. "Economic pressure, appropriately and
> openly applied, is one
> such means of action."
> 
> It  was not clear how many of the WCC's 342
> Protestant and Orthodox member
> churches would heed the call.
> 
> However, in what appears to be a  hardening of some
> Christian groups' stance
> on the conflict, the Disciples  of Christ passed a
> resolution in July
> calling on Israel to take down the  separation
> fence, with other churches
> considering similar resolutions, the  Times said.
> 
> "Multinational corporations have been involved in
> the demolition of
> Palestinian homes," the WCC statement said, adding
> that they  were also
> involved in "the construction of settlements and
> settlement infrastructure
> on occupied territory, in building a dividing wall
> which is  also largely
> inside occupied territory, and in other violations
> of  international law."
> 
> The Presbyterian Church's General Assembly last 
> July called for a "phased,
> selective divestment" beginning no earlier than 
> July 2006. A dissident
> group is asking church leaders to place a 
> moratorium on the project as
> early as next month.
> 
> No companies have  been singled out, but a report
> naming the most likely
> targets is due in  August.
> 
> Human rights groups have urged Caterpillar Inc., the
> world's largest maker
> of construction machinery, to stop selling 
> bulldozers to the Israel Defense
> Forces, saying they are used to wreck  innocent
> Palestinians'
> homes in Gaza and the West Bank.
> 
> The  occupation "is at the center of the cycle of
> violence in the region,
> whether it is suicide bombings or the displacement
> caused by the
> occupation... and impedes a peaceful solution to
> that conflict," the
> committee now selecting possible divestment targets
> said  recently.
> 
> It is unclear how much of the church's $8 billion
> portfolio - investments
> covering pensions and other holdings controlled by 
> its leadership - might
> be at issue.
> 
> Jewish groups are clearly  upset. The New York Times
> reported that some of
> them have accused the  Church of anti-Semitism.
> 
> "Instead of talking about peace, we're  talking
> about Presbyterians," David
> Elcott, director of inter-religious  affairs for the
> American Jewish
> Committee, said this month. "They have  deflected
> conversation in a very
> negative way."
> 
> The move was also  condemned by the Anti-Defamation
> League. "As we have said
> repeatedly in  conversation with Presbyterian Church
> leaders," National
> Director Abraham  Foxman said in a statement,
> "divestment policies are
> counterproductive and  a detriment to the newly
> revived peace initiative
> between the Israelis and  Palestinians, and
> fundamentally flawed as a
> mechanism for resolving the  conflict. Divestment
> hurts not only Israel, but
> has economic impact on Palestinians as well."
> 
> The 2.5 million-strong church, the ninth  largest in
> the U.S., represents
> most U.S. Presbyterians. 
> 
> ---
> 
> New York Times (front page) - Saturday 6th August
> 2005
> 
> Threat to Divest is Church Tool in Israeli Fight By
> Laurie Goodstein
> 
> The Presbyterian Church U.S.A. announced Friday that
> it would press four
> American corporations to stop providing military
> equipment and technology to
> Israel for use in the occupation of the Palestinian
> territories, and that if
> the companies did not comply, the church would take
> a vote to divest its
> stock in them.
> 
> The companies - Caterpillar, Motorola, ITT
> Industries and United
> Technologies - were selected from a list of several
> dozen possibilities by a
> church investment committee that met Friday in
> Seattle. The Presbyterians
> accused these companies of selling helicopters,
> cellphones, night vision
> equipment and other items Israel uses to enforce its
> occupation.
> 
> In an effort to appear even-handed in the
> Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the
> church committee also included Citigroup on its list
> of targets, alleging it
> had a connection to a bank accused of having a role
> in funneling money from
> Islamic charities to the families of Palestinian
> suicide bombers. The church
> said it included Citigroup because it was mentioned
> in an article in The
> Wall Street Journal.
> 
> A spokeswoman for Citigroup called the church's
> assertion "an outrage," a
> reaction echoed at several of the other
> corporations.
> 
> The Presbyterian Church U.S.A. is in the forefront
> of a campaign now
> spreading to other mainline Protestant churches to
> use corporate divestment
> as a tactic in the Middle East conflict, a tactic
> that is roiling relations
> with Jewish groups.
> 
> The Episcopal Church U.S.A., the United Church of
> Christ, two regions of the
> United Methodist Church, as well as international
> groups like the World
> Council of Churches and the Anglican Consultative
> Council have all urged
> consideration of divestment or economic pressure in
> recent months, though
> the tone and emphasis of each resolution varies. The
> Disciples of Christ
> passed a resolution last month calling on Israel to
> tear down the barrier it
> has built to wall off the occupied territories, and
> other churches are
> considering similar resolutions.
> 
> Some Jewish groups accuse the churches of singling
> out Israel for blame and
> failing to address the Palestinians' role in
> perpetuating the violence.
> Several have even said they see anti-Semitism behind
> the churches' moves.
> 
> The Rev. Clifton Kirkpatrick, stated clerk of the
> Presbyterian Church
> U.S.A., said in an  interview:
> "It's not a campaign to divest from the
> state of Israel. We're fully committed to the state
> of Israel. But it is a
> campaign to divest from particular activities that
> are doing damage and
> creating injustice and violence, whether that's the
> building of the
> separation barrier, construction related to the
> occupation, or weapons and
> materials that lead to suicide bombings."
> 
> Many American churches used divestment in the 1980's
> to pressure the South
> African government to end apartheid. But applying
> the tactic to Israel has
> alarmed many American Jewish groups and caused a
> breach in what has been a
> long-term alliance between Jews and mainline
> Protestant churches, like the
> Presbyterians, that have leaned politically liberal.
> In decades past, Jewish and Protestant groups have
> worked together on a
> range of social issues, from racism to global
> poverty to women's rights.
> 
> "This is a brilliantly organized political campaign
> to hurt Israel, and it's
> not going to help a single Palestinian," said Rabbi
> Abraham Cooper,
> associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a
> Jewish watchdog group based
> in Los Angeles. "When you look at the list of
> companies, this is basically a
> recipe for Israel to disarm."
> 
> Rabbi Cooper said the Protestant churches were
> ignoring the current "reality
> on the ground" - that Israel is preparing to
> withdraw this month from Gaza
> and remove settlements there. "Instead of divesting,
> these churches should
> be investing," he said. "There is so much
> humanitarian need on the ground in
> the Holy Land. We're not telling them: 'Stay out of
> it. It's not your
> business.' There's a ton of work to be done."
> 
> He called the churches' actions "functionally
> anti-Semitic." But he said
> that after attending the conventions of the United
> Church of Christ and the
> Disciples of Christ this year, he concluded that the
> resolutions were being
> "rammed through" by denominational leaders and were
> not reflective of the
> churches' grassroots membership.
> 
> However, David Elcott, director of interreligious
> affairs in the United
> States for the American Jewish Committee, said that
> he made a distinction
> between the different church resolutions. He said he
> found the Presbyterian
> Church's resolution "morally reprehensible" because
> it singled out Israel
> for blame, but that the United Church of Christ had
> been more evenhanded,
> condemning violence in the Middle East no matter the
> source.
> 
> The Presbyterian Church owns hundreds of thousands
> of shares of stock in the
> five companies through its pension fund for retired
> church workers and
> through church foundations. It did not say how much
> money it has invested in
> these companies, but judging by the numbers of
> shares it said it owns, the
> church's investment in the companies totals about
> $60 million in holdings.
> 
> The Presbyterian Church's committee on Mission
> Responsibility Through
> Investment has brought similar economic pressure
> against other companies
> accused of abetting human rights abuses in countries
> like China, the Sudan,
> Myanmar, Nigeria and Guatemala. But church staff
> members said this was the
> first time it had focused on companies doing
> business in Israel.
> 
> The Presbyterians gave a variety of reasons for
> choosing these five
> companies. It accused Caterpillar of selling Israel
> heavy equipment used for
> demolishing Palestinian homes, and of constructing
> roads and infrastructure
> in the occupied territories and Israeli settlements.
> 
> The company released a statement saying: "For the
> past four years, activists
> have wrongly included Caterpillar in a publicity
> campaign aimed at advancing
> their much larger political agendas. Over that same
> period of time we've
> repeatedly evaluated our position, as have our
> shareholders, and determined
> that while the protests occasionally succeed in
> getting headlines, they
> neither change the facts nor our position."
> 
> The Presbyterian committee said in its announcement
> that it included United
> Technologies Corporation, a military contractor,
> because a subsidiary
> provides helicopters used by the Israeli military
> "in attacks in the
> occupied territories against suspected Palestinian
> terrorists."
> 
> A company spokesman, Paul Jackson, responded by
> e-mail: "UTC has been widely recognized as an
> ethical and responsible
> corporation. Work on military programs is
> stringently regulated by the U.S.
> government, and UTC complies wholly with all
> policies and related
> regulations."
> 
> The church said it identified Motorola because the
> company has a contract to
> develop wireless encrypted communications for the
> Israeli military in the
> territories and is a "majority investor in one of
> Israel's four cell phone
> companies."
> 
> Norman Sandler, a manager for Motorola on global
> issues, said the church's
> action "came completely out of the blue." He said
> the company supplies radio
> products to Israel, as well as to many Arab
> countries.
> 
> ITT also made the church's list because, the
> committee said, it supplies the
> Israeli military with "communications, electronic
> and night vision equipment
> used by its forces in the occupied territories." A
> spokesman for ITT did not
> respond to a message left on Friday afternoon.
> 
> Leah Johnson, a spokeswoman for Citigroup, said:
> "Any assertion that
> Citigroup supports terrorism in any way is an
> outrage. We take all possible
> measures to ensure that our institution is not used
> by criminals or as a
> conduit to fund terrorist activities."
> 
> Despite the bitterness the divestment moves have
> evoked among Jewish
> organizations, Christian and Jewish leaders alike
> said these developments
> had prompted intensive and productive dialogue
> sessions both at the national
> level and between "hundreds" of churches and
> synagogues nationwide.
> 
> A delegation of prominent Jewish and Christian
> leaders is set to travel to
> Jerusalem in September.
> 
> [END]
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Monika:
> 
> [START]
> 
> NS und Christentum
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:03:07 -0500 
>     
> War es alles nur Propaganda? Entscheided euch
> selber. 
> 
> Monika
> 
>
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/deutsch/archiv/artikel/NSChrist
> entum.html#rede
>  
>
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/deutsch/archiv/artikel/NSChrist
> entum.html
> 
> [END]
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Michelle Kunert:
> 
> [START]
> 
> Must be famous rock star to be Hitler fan?!-Michelle
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:27:49 -0700 
> 
> I just wanted to point out for PBS's pledging time
> they are running rock
> star David Bowie's concerts, a British born musician
> of partial German
> ancestry who has gotten away with admitting he is a
> fan of Hitler who lives
> in Berlin all because he has made himself a famous
> rock-pop star.(Yes David
> Bowie speaks and sings fluently in German) This
> certainly makes interesting
> predicament that makes that every historical
> revisionist must consider in
> not losing their savings to the zionist movement,
> and that apparently one
> must somehow figure out how get into the rock music
> business to teach it.
> For this Bowie starting in the 1970's has gotten
> away with saying that
> England "needed a new Hitler" and "Hitler was the
> first great rock star" ,
> and mentioning other pro-Hitler things for which he
> ironically has never yet
> been pressured to apologize for!  One such example
> 
>
www.tiscali.co.uk/music/biography/david_bowie_biography/3
> points out the worst thing that Bowie has been
> accused of is that he must be
> on high on drugs to when he praises Hitler,  but has
> Bowie has denied this
> since he claims he has always hated hard illegal
> drugs.
>      
> The only thing I cannot figure out is why is Bowie
> now married to a daughter
> of the a Somalian diplomat, who is a "supermodel"
> involved in politics in
> Africa.
> 
> Michelle Kunert
> 
> [END]
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Adelaide Institute:
> 
> http://www.adelaideinstitute.org
> 
> [START}
> 
> Owing to address book importation work some email
> addresses may not be
> current. Please advise if you wish to be removed
> from Adelaide Institute's
> email service.
> 
> =====
>  
> Another Freedom Fighter making a stand against the
> Holocaust Industry
>  
> Siegfried Verbeke, whose uncle was executed by the
> Allies for being a German
> collaborator  - which was not a fact - has now been
> re-arrested at Amsterdam
> Airport. 
>  
> View preliminary report and some pics at:
>  
> Siegfried Verbeke next POW ofHolocaust Industry -
> arrested at Amsterdam
> Airport 3 August 2005
> 
> [END]
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Pfarrer Robert:
> 
> [START]
> 
> Re: PATRIOT LETTER: TO SERVE OR NOT TO SERVE --
> CATCHING UP WITH YOUR MAIL
> To: thetruthisback@yahoo.com 
>     
> Let me remark on a couple of things:  First, I'm a
> baseball fan and avid
> softball player SO I was interested in all the
> controversy surrounding the
> remarks regarding "Caribbean" players in San
> Francisco.  However, I notice
> there is no similar outrage when there are "racist"
> comments regarding
> Germans.  
> Perhaps the most virulent anti-German statements
> appeared on MSNBC's Tucker
> Carlson show the evening of July 29, but I have
> heard nothing decrying such 
> crap.      
> Secondly, regarding the atomic bombing of the Japan.
> 
> I do not support that bombing, especially the second
> bombing of Nagasaki
> which wiped out almost all of Japan's Roman Catholic
> population.  However, I
> fail to see Michelle's point in connecting that
> bombing with the lack of
> youth in Japan's population today.  
> I also take issue with her statement  that Japan
> is/was the most culturally
> sensitive and civil among the Asian world.  Tell
> that to the Koreans among
> whom I have some affection and intimate knowledge.  
> 
> Pfarrer Robert
> 
> [END]
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> BOOKS FOR SALE:
> 
> AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY NEWS LIBRARY:
> 
> * UDO WALENDY - FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN
> NATION - $12.00
> (INCLUDING SHIPPING)
> 
> * CHRISTINE B. MILLER - REALITY CHECK - SOFT COVER -
> $10.00 (SHIPPING
> INCLUDED)
> 
> * WALTER F. MUELLER - REVISIONIST RESOURCE GUIDE -
> $8.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
> 
> * ERNST ZUNDEL - SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT -
> LETTERS FROM CELL #7 - SOFT
> COVER - $6.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
> 
> * JOHN RAWLINGS/MICHAEL PASSMORE (GERMAN TRANSLATION
> GUENTHER DECKERT) - THE
> POSTAL HISTORY OF THE NUEREMBERG RALLIES - SOFT
> COVER - BLACK/WHITE &
> COLOR(COFFEE TABLE SIZE) - $ 35.00 (SHIPPING
> INCLUDED)
> 
> * SPECIAL EDITION - THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
> NUREMBERG RALLIES (THE
> HOFFMANN RALLY CARDS) - SOFT COVER - COLOR - $ 12.00
> (SHIPPING INCLUDED) 
> 
> * DER DEUTSCHE ADERLASS - BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH -
> SOFT COVER - IN GERMAN
> LANGUAGE - $ 25.00 (SHIPPING
> INCLUDED)
> 
> * DER ANGRIFF - BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH - SOFT COVER
> - IN GERMAN LANGUAGE - $
> 27.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
> 
> * MARGARET STUCKI - A PICTORIAL AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF THE
> SWISS-AMERICAN ARTIST -
> BY DR. MARGARET STUCKI - SOFT COVER - $25.00
> (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
> 
> * VOELKERMORD AN DEN HERERO IN DEUTSCH SUEDWEST
> AFRIKA
> - BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH - SOFT COVER - $22.00
> (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
> 
> * EIN NATIONALSTAAT FUER BUREN - BY DR. CLAUS
> NORDBRUCH - SOFT COVER - IN
> GERMAN - $ 9.00 (SHPPING
> INCLUDED)
> 
> * UEBER DIE PFLICHT - BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH - SOFT
> COVER - IN GERMAN - $
> 27.00 (INCLUDES SHIPPING)
> 
> * VOLKSBETRUG AM KAP - BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH - HARD
> COVER - IN GERMAN - $
> 17.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)
> 
> * SIND GEDANKEN NOCH FREI? ZENSUR IN DEUTSCHLAND -
> BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH -
> HARD COVER - IN GERMAN - $ 27.00 (INCLUDES SHIPPING)
> 
> To order, please send a check or money order to:
> 
> Community News
> PO Box 191677
> Sacramento, CA 95819
> 
> or e-mail us and we will send you an e-mail bill
> through PayPal.
> 
>
******************************************************
> 
> Walter F. Mueller
> "The truth is back in business"
> 
> The "Patriot Letter" is a free news service of
> Community News, a monthly
> publication with a circulation of 20,000. To
> subscribe to Community News
> please e-mail for more information.
> 
> To be removed from this e-mail list, reply with
> "unsubscribe". 
> 
> 
>
============================================================================
> ==============================
> ==================================================
> 
> From: Fred Burks [mailto:fredburks@earthlink.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2005 4:51 AM
> To: Undisclosed Recipients
> Subject: A Most Profound, Inspiring Spiritual Essay
> 
> -- One email per month is sent to this list. To
> unsubscribe, reply with
> "unsubscribe" in the subject line. To subscribe to
> our list of inspiration
> and education (one email per week), send an email to
> fredburks@earthlink.net
> with "subscribe 1" in the subject line. To subscribe
> to our list of insider
> information on deep cover-ups (one email every few
> days) type "subscribe
> deep" in the subject line. --
> 
> This message is available on the Internet at
>
http://www.weboflove.org/050809profoundspiritualwriting
> 
> August 9, 2005
> Dear friends,
> 
> Though I have worked as a language interpreter for
> George W. Bush, Bill
> Clinton, and many other world leaders, I am in my
> core a deeply spiritual
> being committed to personal and global
> transformation through love, healing,
> and empowerment, and to what's best for all of us.
> Below, I want to share
> with you a brief summary of the most profound
> spiritual writing I have ever
> encountered. I deeply respect whatever spiritual
> path you may have chosen
> for yourself, only offering this profound, inspiring
> writing as a possible
> means of enriching your life. Thanks for caring, and
> I wish you a most
> wonderful spiritual journey throughout your life. 
> 
> With love and warm wishes,
> Fred Burks
> 
> P.S. For the full 17 pages of these inspiring
> spiritual writings, see the
> two links below.
> 
> 
> http://www.weboflove.org/wingmakers - Principles of
> Self-Enlightenment
> (seven pages)
> http://www.weboflove.org/wingmakers2 - Shifting
> Paradigms (ten pages)
> Principles of Self-Enlightenment
> 
> The self-enlightenment experience is initiated by
> the realization that you
> are capable of direct access to the Divine. This is
> the realization that the
> wisdom of the Divine is discovered deep within your
> own soul. There are wide
> ranges of expressions that can induce the
> self-enlightenment experience and
> liberate the soul from external controls. Inasmuch
> as these expressions can
> vary, the intent of the expressions is quite
> narrowly defined as the intent
> to expand into a state of integration whereby all
> aspects of your conscious
> self become increasingly aligned with your divine
> essence. 
> 
> There are three particular life principles that help
> to align your
> perspective with the perspective of divine essence
> and thus facilitate the
> self-enlightenment experience: 1) seeing the Divine
> in all; 2) nurturance of
> life; and 3) gratitude. When you apply these
> principles, a deeper meaning
> will be revealed to the seemingly random events of
> your life experience. 
> 
> Seeing the Divine in All
> 
> This is the principle that the Divine is present and
> can be seen everywhere
> and in all manifestations of life. It is interwoven
> in all things like a
> mosaic whose pieces adhere to the same wall, and are
> thus unified. However,
> it is not the picture that unifies the mosaic, but
> the wall upon which its
> pieces adhere. Similarly, the Divine paints a
> picture so diverse and
> seemingly unrelated that there appears to be no
> unification. Yet it is not
> the outward manifestations that unify. It is the
> inward center of divine
> energy that unifies all life. 
> 
> Seeing the Divine in all is the principle that all
> manifestations of life
> convey an expression of All That Is. It does not
> matter how far the unifying
> energy has been distorted; the Divine can be
> observed. It is the action of
> perceiving unification even when the outward
> manifestations appear random,
> distorted, or chaotic. The principle of seeing the
> Divine in all is the
> perception that life is perfect in its expression
> because it flows from
> perfection, and that no matter how divergent its
> manifestations are, all
> life is an extension of the Divine. 
> 
> In light of the obvious turmoil and destruction that
> accompanies life on
> Earth, this is an outlook or perception that may
> seem naive. How can life in
> all its forms and expressions be perceived as
> optimal or perfect? This is
> the great paradox of life, and it cannot be
> reconciled with your mental or
> emotional capabilities. It can only be understood in
> the context of the
> soul, which is deathless, timeless, and limitless. 
> 
> Calling forth the divine perceptions of the soul is
> actualized through
> looking for the outward and inward manifestations of
> the Divine. It is not
> only that the Divine is found within you and within
> every individual
> manifestation of life; it is also in itself the
> wholeness of all life. Thus,
> this principle calls for seeing the Divine in all
> its diverse forms of
> manifestation, as well as in the wholeness of life
> itself.
> 
> Nurturance of Life
> 
> Life, in this definition, is an individual's
> sovereign reality. It is
> subjective and impressionable. Life is the wholeness
> of experience flowing
> past the individual's field of perception in the
> present moment. Nurturance
> of life is the principle whereby an individual is in
> alignment with the
> natural expansion of intelligence inherent within
> all life. This alignment
> enhances the life energy that flows past the
> individual with the clear
> intent of gentle support. It is the action of
> opening to the highest motive
> in all people and in all life and supporting the
> flow of this highest
> intention towards its ultimate expression. In so
> doing, the action is
> performed without judgment, analysis, or attachment
> to outcome. It involves
> simply nurturing the highest energy that flows from
> all people and all
> beings, and thus supporting their fullest expression
> of life. 
> 
> This is a departure from the normal perception that
> nurturing support can
> only be granted when others are in alignment with
> your personal will and
> desires. When, instead, you view everything in your
> life as an integrated
> energy flowing as an expression of ever-expanding
> Divine Intelligence, all
> life is honored as an extension of the Divine.
> Energy is an element of life
> that is so subtly interwoven with form that it is
> one, in much the same
> manner as space and time are inextricably linked in
> union. Life energy is
> always in a state of becoming. It is never static or
> regressive in its
> natural state. You are very capable of nurturing
> this natural expansion of
> energy to forge new channels of expression and
> experience. 
> 
> There are many specific actions that can be taken to
> nurture life. Each soul
> can transform energy through a tremendous variety of
> means. Working through
> your body, your soul is able to collect and store
> energy and redirect its
> purpose or application. This transformation of
> energy can occur on both
> personal and universal levels of expression. That
> is, within an individual's
> field of awareness, energy can be transformed to
> conform to a vision of
> personal welfare, or aligned with a vision of
> universal welfare and
> goodwill. 
> 
> One of the best methods to transform energy is
> through one's belief system.
> All beliefs have energy systems that act like
> birthing chambers for the
> manifestation of beliefs. Within these energy
> systems are currents that
> direct life experience. Your soul is aware of these
> currents either
> consciously or unconsciously and allows them to
> carry you into the realm of
> experience that exemplifies your core belief system.
> By cultivating beliefs
> that expand and transform energy, you are able to
> engage energy systems that
> are nurturing to life in all its myriad forms. When
> your beliefs are clearly
> defined as intentions, your life energy engages
> fully in the present moment.
> Clarity of intention is essential to engaging the
> energy system of your core
> beliefs, and to allowing the nurturance of life to
> prevail in all
> activities. 
> 
> Gratitude 
> 
> If you are aware — or at least interested in having
> the awareness — of how
> perfectly the Divine supports your sovereign
> reality, there is a powerful
> and natural sense of gratitude that flows from you
> to the Divine. It is this
> wellspring of gratitude that opens the channel of
> support from the Divine to
> the individual and establishes a collaboration of
> purpose to transform the
> individual soul into a pure expression of divine
> essence. It is principally
> gratitude that opens you to connection with your
> divine essence.
> 
> When you project gratitude, regardless of
> circumstance or condition, life
> becomes increasingly supportive. This feeling of
> gratitude coupled with the
> mental concept of appreciation is expressed like an
> invisible message in all
> directions and at all times. Gratitude is an
> essential facet of love that
> opens you to redefine your purpose as a supportive
> extension of the Divine,
> rather than the whimsical outreach of fate or the
> exacting reaction of a
> mechanical, detached universe. Establishing a
> relationship with the universe
> through the outflow of gratitude also attracts life
> experience that is
> transformative — experience that is richly devoted
> to uncovering life's
> deepest meaning and most formative purpose. 
> 
> When you are aligned with divine essence and live
> from this perspective as
> part of an ever-unfolding reality, you attract a
> natural state of harmony.
> This does not mean that your life is without
> problems or discomforts; rather
> it signifies a perception that there is an integral
> purpose in what life
> reveals. Natural harmony perceives that life
> experience is meaningful to the
> extent that you are aligned with your divine
> essence. When your personal
> reality flows in alignment with divine essence, you
> create lasting joy and
> inner peace. 
> 
> It is the perspective of divine essence that all
> life is pure love in its
> fullest expression, and that in this single concept,
> all life is conceived
> and forever exists. This becomes the core belief
> from which all other
> beliefs arise. And as these beliefs expand outward,
> this core belief system
> emerges with a clear intent of supporting a
> fundamental perspective of
> seeing, nurturing, and appreciating the universe as
> the divine cradle from
> which all life is created and evolves. 
> 
> These life principles are merely symbols represented
> in words and served to
> you as a potential recipe to stir awake the embers
> of light that tirelessly
> burn within. There are no specific techniques or
> rituals that are required
> to invoke the power of these principles. They are
> simply perspectives. In a
> real sense, they are intentions that attract
> experience that expands
> consciousness. They do not provide quick fixes or
> instant realizations. They
> are amplifiers of personal will and intention that
> clarify how one lives.
> Their transformative power is contained exclusively
> in the intent of their
> application. 
> 
> Through these principles of self-enlightenment, you
> can become a master of
> empowering your deeper self. If you choose to apply
> these life principles
> with clear intent, you have the tools to accelerate
> the emergence of divine
> essence within you. Thus, you can feel the
> perspective, insights, and
> empowered abilities of your divine essence to create
> new realms of
> possibility and shape them as learning adventures
> that liberate and expand
> your consciousness. This is the underlying purpose
> of these principles, and
> perhaps the best reason to explore them. 
> 
> For the full text of this summary:
> www.weboflove.org/wingmakers
> For a text-only print version of this summary:
> www.weboflove.org/self-enlightenment
> 
> 
> See our collection of inspirational readings at
> http://www.weboflove.org/inspirationalstories 
> 
> 
> Your donations, however small or large, help greatly
> to support this
> important work. 
> To make a secure donation:
>
http://order.kagi.com/cgi-bin/store.cgi?storeID=6CYJA1
> 
> Explore these empowering websites coordinated by
> website founder Fred Burks:
> http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the
> world has a heart
> http://www.WantToKnow.info - Revealing major
> cover-ups & working together
> for the good of all
> http://www.gcforall.org - Building a Global
> Community for All
> http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of
> Love that interconnects
> us all
> Together, we are building a brighter future based on
> love and cooperation
> 
> One email per month is sent to this list. To
> unsubscribe, reply with
> "unsubscribe" in the subject line. To subscribe to
> our list of inspiration
> and education (one email per week), send an email to
> fredburks@earthlink.net
> with "subscribe 1" in the subject line. To subscribe
> to our list of
> information on deep cover-ups (one email every few
> days) type "subscribe
> deep" in the subject line. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>