The Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI) has recently revived the 24-year old case by bringing a new legal complaint against the Ukrainian born retiree. They claim Demjanjuk was a guard in other Nazi concentration camps and that he lied about his wartime activities in his application to enter the United States in 1951. Commenting on the matter, an official of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called the renewed OSI campaign “a matter of justice and the integrity of American citizenship.”(1) Justice Department attorneys say war criminals must be prosecuted, regardless of their age.(2)
Noted journalist John Sack has documented how Jewish officials in Poland persecuted and murdered large numbers of German prisoners in the aftermath of World War Two in his book, An Eye for an Eye. After committing such dastardly deeds, many of these Jews came to America.(3) If it is right and just that alleged non-Jewish war criminals like Demjanjuk be legally hounded and deported, then Jewish war criminals should be met with the same fate. If the U.S. government devotes resources to the rooting out of non-Jewish war criminals, then they should devote resources to the rooting out of Jewish war criminals. To concentrate only upon non-Jewish war criminals is selective justice. And Selective justice is in fact injustice. Why the hypocritical double standard? What really lies behind this campaign?
Holocaust revisionism, the theory that the traditional view of the Jewish Holocaust contains lies, exaggerations and other falsehoods, is a serious threat to Zionist power and influence. Various governments have resorted to “war crimes trials” to combat its phenomenal growth. Indeed, Israel’s former Attorney General, Yitzhak Zamir, publicly admitted that this was one of the major purposes of the Israeli Demjanjuk trial: “At a time when there are those who even deny that the Holocaust ever took place, it is important to remind the world of what a fascist regime is capable of…and in this respect the Demjanjuk trial will fulfill an important function.”(4)
In 1993, as the case against Demjanjuk was falling apart, an Israeli prosecutor close to the case acknowledged a political motive for continuing the campaign. “So the important thing now is at least to prove that Demjanjuk was part of the Nazi extermination machine…otherwise…we will be making a great contribution to the new world-wide movement of those who deny the Holocaust took place.”(5)
California psychology professor Kevin MacDonald has shown how Jewish groups, in attempting to gain approval from non-Jews, have often framed their purely parochial interests in terms of universal principles that supposedly benefit everyone.(6) With this in mind, I believe, the ADL and OSI made the renewed campaign against Demjanjuk appear to be in the interest of all Americans. At the risk of being redundant I will again quote the ADL official. The current campaign against Demjanjuk, he alleged, is “a matter of justice and the integrity of American citizenship.” In short, parochial Zionist interests are cloaked in the lofty-sounding rhetoric of morality and patriotism.
The further prosecution of John Demjanjuk will only prolong the undeserved suffering of an elderly man and the entire Demjanjuk family, and possibly exacerbate the already existing tensions between Jews and Eastern European émigré groups. Another such trial does not serve the American ideal of justice. It is an example of selective justice or rather injustice;. the U.S. government makes no attempt to root out alleged Jewish war criminals, just alleged non-Jewish war criminals like Demjanjuk. Another trial serves the ulterior goals of the ADL and OSI in combating Holocaust revisionism, a dire threat to the entire Zionist juggernaut.
The hunt for and prosecution of John Demjanjuk is but one example of discrimination that Euro-Americans face. On the subject of war crimes trials, bias directed against non-Jewish, European émigrés is alive and well in the United States.
NOTES1. The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio), May 20, 1999, p.10-A.
2.The Plain Dealer, May 28, 2001, p.8-A.
3. An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945 (Basic Books, 1993), p.150.
4. See Cleveland Jewish News, March 21, 1986, p.16.
5. Quoted in Yoram Sheftel’s Defending 'Ivan the Terrible': The Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk (Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996), p.402.
6. Separation and its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism (Praeger, 1998), p.193, passim.
© Copyright 2001, Paul Grubach