1972: A Somewhat Different Auschwitz Trial
Contractors of Auschwitz Tried in Vienna
By Dipl.-Ing. Walter Lüftl
Walter Dejaco (left) and Fritz Ertl (right): The contractors of the crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau. Thanks to an expert report they were acquitted.
During the years 1964/65, a giant Auschwitz trial took place in Frankfurt, Germany. Almost all defendants accused of having participated in the crimes claimed to have been committed in this camp were eventually sentenced. Even though the Frankfurt court dealt with one of the largest mass murders ever committed in mankind history - if one believes the charges - the judges of this trial did nothing to find out if the claims made by witnesses were based on facts; the court did not investigate the alleged murder weapons, did not try to find any trace of the dead or of its victims, and did not hear experts to critically assess the witnesses' claims. Not a single forensic expert report was asked for or provided.
The trial against Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl was a little different. It took place before the Superior Criminal Court in Vienna between January 1 and March 10, 1972, under the presiding judge Dr. Reisenleitner. Both defendants were officers of the Waffen-SS during the war and as such were at times involved in the design, construction, and maintenance of the crematoria of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp. Because according to today's official historiography these buildings served for the mass murder of European Jews, both were accused by the Austrian public prosecutor of having at least indirectly participated in the planning and execution of this crime.
The trial files are allegedly no longer accessible in the Vienna courthouse. However, a short review of this trial will be attempted, based on newspaper articles. Judging by these reports, this trial was in line with the other trials about actual or alleged violent NS-crimes regarding external circumstances as described by Köhler:
"A construction drawing by Dejaco of both large gas chambers with his signature exists."
Plans of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp were displayed in the courtroom, in which
"clearly the crematoria, the gas chambers, the barracks and the infamous ramp
were allegedly drawn, although no plan has yet been found, on which the words "human gas chamber" are written or from which use as gas chambers could be indirectly construed.
"Dr. Obenaus, the defense lawyer for Dejaco, submitted part of a letter, which Langbein allegedly wrote to former inmates of Auschwitz. It says: 'It is in my opinion unimportant whether an inmate can say anything positive about Dejaco. But when he can say that he participated in the building of the crematorium, this can be perceived as participation in the murder, and his punishment can be achieved.' The attorney explains that several former inmates were upset since they could only say good things about Dejaco, and several engaged in correspondence with him through letters."
Contrary to many other trials against so-called National Socialist violent crimes, the media's interest in these trials was relatively minor. Thus, the Vienna newspaper Die Presse evidently did not report about it, and the trial itself took place before a mostly empty court room.
Several interesting statements by the press, the accused, the witnesses, and the court should be mentioned in addition:
[...] were especially cruel. The killing procedure in the gas chambers lasted 10 minutes. During this time the victims had to suffer unspeakable agonies."
"The gassing of the victims
"After the gassing, the victims' gold teeth were pulled and their hair cut in 'Kanada' [correct: in the storage of effects...]."
However, the witnesses mostly agreed in reporting that this was allegedly done directly inside the crematoria, otherwise the murdered would have to be transported to the storage part of the camp from the crematoria, and then afterwards returned to the crematoria to be burned.
This last piece of information is quite interesting, since it indicates that the revisionist allegation that criminal courts never use material evidence is false. At least in this trial a construction specialist was requested for his expertise. This construction expert who testified during that trial got in touch with the author of this article and informed him that he had explained more than just the identity of the original plans with the copies, which were in the public prosecutor's hands. He had to answer basically two questions put to him by the court:
Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl were thus acquitted. The public prosecution did announce an appeal, but did not follow through with it. Despite protests no further measures against the two acquitted architects were taken. In the Vienna Auschwitz trial a well known construction specialist prepared an expert opinion. The material evidence did not indicate mass killings with poison gas.
Question: Is this the reason why the files of the trial described here cannot be found?
First published under pen name Michael Gärtner as "Vor 25 Jahren: Ein anderer Auschwitz-Prozeß" in Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung 1(1) (1997), pp. 24f.; translated by Fabian Eschen.
|||See the verdict by the Frankfurt Jury Court, Ref. 50/4 Ks 2/63, reprinted in I. Sagel-Grande, H. H. Fuchs, C. F. Rüter (eds.), Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, vol. 21, University Press, Amsterdam 1979, pp. 361-887.|
|||Ref. 20 Vr 6575/72 (Hv56/72). Robert Van Pelt quotes in his "Van Pelt Report": 20 Vr 3806/64 and 27 C Vr 3806/64), which however, is a case opened in 1964; Pelt Report, p. 135 n. 59; introduced in evidence during the libel case before the Queen's Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, David John Cawdell Irving vs. (1) Penguin Books Limited, (2) Deborah E. Lipstadt, ref. 1996 I. No. 113.|
|||M. Köhler, "The Value of Testimony and Confessions Concerning the Holocaust" in, E. Gauss (ed.) Dissecting the Holocaust, 2nd ed., Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago, IL, 2003, pp 85-131.|
|||Kurier, Jan. 19, 1972.|
|||Wiener Zeitung, Jan. 19, 1972.|
|||Kurier, Jan. 27, 1972, Wiener Zeitung, Feb. 4, 1972.|
|||Wiener Zeitung, Jan. 26, 1972.|
|||Ibid, Jan. 29, 1972.|
|||Ibid, March 10, 1972.|
|||Ibid, Jan. 19 & 20, 1972.|
|||Ibid, Jan. 22, 1972.|
|||Kurier & Wiener Zeitung, Jan. 19, 1972.|
|||Kurier, Jan. 18, 1972; Wiener Zeitung, Jan. 19, 1972.|
|||Wiener Zeitung, Jan. 19, 1972.|
|||Ibid, Jan. 20, 1972.|
|||Cf. J.-C. Pressac, Die Krematorien von Auschwitz, Piper, Munich 1994, Appendix.|
|||Wiener Zeitung, Feb. 11, 1972.|
|||Ibid, Feb. 10 & 23, 1972.|
|||Niederösterreichisches Volksblatt, March 2, 1972.|
|||Wiener Zeitung, March 11., 1972.|
Source: The Revisionist 2(3) (2004), pp. 294f.
Back to the Table of Contents